Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sarah Nikocevic vs Aneta Kladivova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nikocevic vs Kladivova analysis and find out who is favored!
Sarah Nikocevic vs Aneta Kladivova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nikocevic 1 - 0 Kladivova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nikocevic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kladivova has won 42.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nikocevic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kladivova has won 56.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 43.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nikocevic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kladivova has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nikocevic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kladivova winning 58.93% (W/L 33/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nikocevic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 15/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Kladivova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 125/ 77), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 29/ 29).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nikocevic winning 1 times and Kladivova being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nikocevic winning 2 and Kladivova winning 0. The last match between Nikocevic and Kladivova was at the W15 Stuttgart-Stammheim, 21-01-2019, Q1 round, I.hard with Sarah Nikocevic getting the victory 6-4 1-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nikocevic and Kladivova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nikocevic winning 0 times and Kladivova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nikocevic winning 0, and Kladivova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nikocevic has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kladivova has played against players with an average rank of 279.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nikocevic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kladivova has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nikocevic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kladivova has converted 47.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
420
Rank
358
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
50% (17-17)
Career Total W/L
58% (155-110)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (10-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sarah Nikocevic | Aneta Kladivova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 7 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 1-0 ret. | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sarah Nikocevic | Aneta Kladivova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (22/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (200/188) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 68 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 156.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (746/1163) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (440/746) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (177/417) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (82/174) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (603/1261) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (9/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (9/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 9% (11/1) |
Sarah Nikocevic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Manon Arcangioli
Player
Sarah Nikocevic
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sarah Nikocevic
Player
Katharina Hering
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Galateia Mesochoritou
Player
Sarah Nikocevic
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nefisa Berberovic
Player
Sarah Nikocevic
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
51%
(
46 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
94
|
0-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oana Georgeta Simion
Player
Sarah Nikocevic
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
51%
(
48 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarah Nikocevic
Player
Greta Carbone
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
49%
(
18 of
37)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Sarah Nikocevic
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Aneta Kladivova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lilli Tagger
Player
Aneta Kladivova
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
48 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
99)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Aneta Kladivova
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Daniela Vismane
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Aneta Kladivova
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Jana Bojovic
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Anamari Znuderl
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Aneta Kladivova
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Aneta Kladivova
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Martina Gaemperle
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Nikocevic Vs Kladivova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
